Hoeveel heb je nodig, 24 megapixels?! Dat is meer dan een 1Ds mark III... Leuk als je RAW's straks 30MB per stuk zijn :S
Volgens mij één groot verkooptrucje; consument ziet 3 camera's; 1 met 10MP, 1 met 15MP en 1 met 24MP en welke koopt hij/zij....?
Er zijn vast en zeker beter stukken over geschreven, maar even snel Googlend (
http://news.cnet.com/2100-1041_3-6156398.html):
"Digital camera makers continue to squeeze ever more megapixels into their products. But does that make for better pictures?
Some experts say no. Image quality isn't improving, they say, and some fear it may actually be degrading as the megapixel race escalates.
"There is definitely a decrease in image quality," said Dave Etchells, editor of a camera reviews Web site, the Imaging Resource, which performs extensive camera tests. "There have been some improvements in semiconductor process technology for sensors, so it's mitigated the problem a bit, but there overall has been an increase in image noise."
The basic concern is that smaller pixels on camera sensors means less sensitivity to light, leading to image noise such as off-color speckles or rough edges, worse performance in dim conditions, and the loss of finer tonal gradations such as the subtle shadows of a white wedding dress. Point-and-shoot cameras, with their small sensors, are the chief culprits."
Quote selectie