Re : Euh ...

Bericht van: Herman (Schüttorf, Duitsland) , 15-01-2006 02:50 

These winds are very unlikely. The small area of damage they might produce would probably not be recognizable along with the mess produced by F4 and F5 wind that would surround the F6 winds. Missiles, such as cars and refrigerators would do serious secondary damage that could not be directly identified as F6 damage. If this level is ever achieved, evidence for it might only be found in some manner of ground swirl pattern, for it may never be identifiable through engineering studies.

Juist of onjuist?   ( 233)
Wilber (Ulft) -- 14-01-2006 23:18
  Volgens mij maar 5 😉  
Richard - Rijssen -- 14-01-2006 23:23
Re : Volgens mij maar 5 😉   ( 118)
Wilber (Ulft) -- 14-01-2006 23:26
  Stom van mij 🙁 , je hebt helemaal gelijk.  
Richard - Rijssen -- 14-01-2006 23:35
Re : Juist of onjuist?   ( 111)
Tom (Nijmegen) -- 14-01-2006 23:25
Re : Juist of onjuist?   ( 79)
Wilber (Ulft) -- 14-01-2006 23:27
Hij maakte de schaalverdeling toekomst-zeker.   ( 72)
Tom (Nijmegen) -- 14-01-2006 23:39
Er zijn er 6   ( 16)
Bart (O.-L.-V.-Waver) -- 15-01-2006 09:09
Re : Juist of onjuist?   ( 74)
Tom van Gent -- 14-01-2006 23:26
Re : Euh ...   ( 30)
Herman (Schüttorf, Duitsland) -- 15-01-2006 02:50