Re : Is dit hier al de revu gepasseerd ?

Bericht van: Wouter (Mol) , 21-03-2007 15:41 

Enkele citaten uit oorspronkelijk artikel:

All the stations in this study show a significant
increase in sea level over the period 1904–2003 with an average increase of 174 mm during that time (Figure 4). This mean rate of 1.74 mm/yr is at the upper end of the range of estimates for the 20th century in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Third Assessment Report (IPCC TAR) [Church et al., 2001], and consistent with other recent estimates [Holgate and Woodworth, 2004; Church and White, 2006].

Although the mean rate of change of global mean sea level is found to be greater in the first half of the twentieth century, the two rates are consistent with being the same at the 95% confidence level, given their individual standard
errors. However, a greater rate of rise in the early part of the record is consistent with previous analyses of tide gauge records which suggested a general deceleration in sea level
rise during the 20th century [Woodworth, 1990; Douglas, 1992; Jevrejeva et al., 2006]. A twentieth century deceleration is consistent with the work of Church and White [2006] who, although finding evidence for a post-1870 acceleration based on an EOF reconstruction of global sea
level, found that much of the overall acceleration occurred in the first half of the 20th century. Church and White [2006] suggested that the greater rate of sea level rise observed in the first half of last century was due to reduced volcanic emissions (and hence also lower variability in sea
level) during the 1930s to 1960s. This idea is supported by results from the HadCM3 model which suggest that the simulated global mean sea level did not accelerate through the twentieth century due to the offsetting of anthropogenic warming by reduced natural forcing [Gregory et al., 2006].

Kortom, 't artikel op die website maakt zich schuldig aan fout citeren (zowel van het artikel, als van het IPCC (het IPCC beweert NIET dat de zeespiegelstijging in de 20e eeuw significant versneld is), en citaten uit hun context trekken wat een zware wetenschappelijke fout is.

Wouter

Is dit hier al de revu gepasseerd ?   ( 383)
Marcus (Sleidinge) ( 6m) -- 21-03-2007 15:21
Re : Is dit hier al de revu gepasseerd ?   ( 186)
Wouter (Mol) ( 22m) -- 21-03-2007 15:41